Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential phase plug

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential pha

    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential phase plug


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential phase plug

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebroncoii View Post
    My opinion:
    The phase plug material is not an issue and makes no difference. A phase plug helps make a smooth transition into the throat of the horn. The original Altec phase plug (circumferential) was designed to work on the horns of the day (multi-cells/311/511/811). The Tangerine phase plug was designed for MR horns.

    There is a sonic difference. The difference is not great. The difference is probably no greater than different manufacturing batches of diaphragms. Your listening space will have more effect on the sound of your horns. I simply select matching diaphragms and don't worry about it.
    I'm' just thinking a harder material would perform better....maybe insignificant.

    A magnetic material is going to affect the field...

    BTW are not the 806 plugs aluminum? I don't recall steel, but I haven't been inside one in ten or 15 years..
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member bfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 1st, 2004
    Posts
    2,891
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential phase plug

    Of interest are the objectives of the Tangerine design as stated by the inventor (Henricksen) in his patent (abbreviated);

    easier/cheaper to produce
    improved efficiency/lower distortion
    plane wave output

    No mention by the inventor of extended response (that came from the marketing dept).

    Quote Originally Posted by whitebroncoii View Post
    My opinion:
    The Tangerine phase plug was designed for MR horns...
    The coincident timing of Tangerine and MantaRay developement agrees. I suspect a MantaRay would hardly work as designed if driven by a spherical wave.

    sidebar
    Henricksen also specified the slit count should be a prime number...

    Added
    OG, I have an affinity for obsidian too, but mine is because of the relative ease of working (5.5 on the Mohs scale).
    "[I]We're going all the way, till the wheels fall off and burn[/I]!"
    Bob Dylan, from [I]Brownsville Girl[/I]

    [I]"Time wounds all heels"[/I]
    John Lennon, referring to the Nixon/Hoover deportation fiasco.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member Ronald Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 28th, 2007
    Posts
    344
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Radial(Tangerine) versus the regular circumcerential phase plug

    bfish: I wholeheartedly agree. Anyone can make a thing with enough money, but it would be a real stroke of genius to achieve the something by spending the minimum of money.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28131802 times.